Menu

How Founders Can Determine The Base Of Revenue Share For The Agency 

Picture of Quan Vo

Quan Vo

CEO of IMP Marketing | Growth Marketing Expert
How Founders Can Determine The Base Of Revenue Share For The Agency 

Mostly, the agency is responsible for growing the entire business, but it is not the only approach. A revenue share partnership can also be based on specific products, product categories, sales channels, or a particular part of the business.

Defining this clearly from the start helps both sides stay aligned and avoid confusion later on.

1. Revenue Share Can Be Based On Product Lines

In some situations, the agency may only be responsible for growing a specific group of products instead of the entire business.

For example, a beauty brand may operate across multiple categories such as skincare, cosmetics, and haircare. However, the revenue share partnership may only focus on selected product lines within one category where both sides see the strongest growth opportunity.

A product-line-based revenue share structure can become more complicated when different products influence each other throughout the customer journey. In many businesses, customers may discover the brand through one product but eventually purchase products from multiple categories.

The same challenge can happen when the business relies heavily on bundles, kits, cross-sell offers, or promotional campaigns that combine multiple products. In these situations, determining how much revenue should be attributed to a specific product line can become much less straightforward.

Therefore, this structure usually works best when the selected products operate relatively independently from the rest of the business, and both sides can clearly define what is included in the partnership from the beginning.

2. Revenue Share Can Be Based On Traffic Sources

Some revenue share partnerships attempt to calculate revenue based on specific traffic sources. Some businesses may have multiple growth channels running at the same time, including Meta Ads, Google Ads, email marketing, organic traffic, referrals, or affiliate partnerships. 

One advantage of this approach is that it can work well when the revenue source is clearly identifiable. Affiliate programs and referral partnerships are common examples because purchases can often be tracked directly through affiliate links, referral codes, or partner-specific tracking systems.

Nevertheless, a source-based revenue share structure can become much more complicated when multiple channels influence the same customer journey. A customer may discover the brand through Meta Ads, return later through Google Search, and eventually purchase after receiving an email campaign.

When founders only assign a few traffic sources to the agency while other channels remain managed separately, it becomes harder to understand the full customer journey, manage the partnership efficiently, and accurately evaluate how different channels contribute to the final purchase.

A better approach is often to give one team responsibility for managing the entire growth system. This gives both sides a clearer picture of customer behavior and business performance. Instead of debating which channel generated a particular sale, the partnership can focus more on improving overall business growth.

3. Revenue Share Can Be Based On Sales Channels

A brand may generate revenue through Shopify, Amazon, Walmart, wholesale distribution, or retail stores at the same time. The agency may only be responsible for helping grow the Shopify channel while the other channels remain outside the partnership.

Under this structure, the revenue share percentage is usually calculated only from the sales channel included in the agreement rather than total company revenue.

The challenge is that sales channels often influence each other. As businesses grow, customers may move between channels depending on pricing, shipping convenience, promotions, marketplace protections, or personal buying preferences.

For instance, a customer may first discover a product through the brand’s website but later choose to purchase through Amazon because of faster shipping, or a more convenient checkout experience.

This is often called a cannibalization situation. The customer is still buying from the same brand, but the revenue moves from one sales channel to another instead of creating new incremental growth. This can make the revenue source much more difficult when different agencies or partners are responsible for different sales channels. 

Overall, there is no single revenue source that works perfectly for every business. However, from our perspective, sales channel-based structures are often among the simplest and most practical to manage.

The most effective approach is to give one agency clear ownership of the sales channel being measured. This creates a more transparent structure and allows both sides to focus on growing the business rather than debating how revenue should be measured.

Conclusion 

Some partnerships’ revenue is based on product lines. Others are based on traffic sources or sales channels.

The right approach usually depends on how the business operates and how clearly revenue can be measured. When both sides agree on that from the beginning, it becomes much easier to build a revenue share structure that feels fair and practical.

Stay tuned for the next articles in this series about how revenue share marketing agencies actually work.


FAQ Revenue Share Model

1. What can revenue be based on in a revenue share partnership?

In a revenue share partnership, revenue can be based on the entire business, specific product lines, traffic sources, or individual sales channels. The right revenue share structure depends on how the business operates and how easily revenue can be measured and attributed. Defining this clearly in the revenue share agreement helps both sides stay aligned and avoid future disputes.

2. Why can traffic-source-based revenue share become difficult?

Traffic-source-based revenue share can become difficult because modern customer journeys often involve multiple marketing channels before a purchase happens. A customer may discover a brand through Meta Ads, return through Google Search, and finally convert through email marketing. This makes revenue attribution much harder and can create challenges when calculating revenue share accurately.

3. Why do many revenue share marketing agencies prefer sales-channel-based structures?

Many revenue share marketing agencies prefer sales-channel-based structures because they are often easier to track, manage, and measure. When an ecommerce growth partner has clear responsibility for a channel such as Shopify, both sides can evaluate business growth more transparently. This allows the partnership to focus on growing revenue instead of debating attribution across multiple channels.

Newsletter

Leave your email here to receive the latest information from us.

Copyright © 2026 IMP Marketing. Privacy Policy

Close